Contract Management
Published 24 September 10
Contract management has important applications within the dairy
industry with the supply of herdsmen and herd managers as part of a
contract herd care service.
Contract management terms offer several advantages:
- The possibility exists to terminate the agreement or easily
change the contract herdsman if a farm manager is unsatisfied with
the service or if agreed objectives have not been met.
- The contract agency will provide regular inspections, meeting
with the client and the contract staff to ensure work is carried
out to the expected standard outlined in the agreed schedule of
services. They can also provide technical support or help with
other management issues and may directly provide worker
training.
- Depending upon the terms of the contract, the agency may also
be responsible for relief cover at no extra charge if the
contractor is ill or injured.
- The agency provides insurance to indemnify the farmer against
damage to his livestock or property caused by any proven negligence
of the contract worker.
- Upon the end of the contract, housing provided for the contract
worker is guaranteed to be handed back with vacant possession. The
farmer is also indemnified against any damage to the property.
- Budgeting and administration are simplified as contracts are
agreed in advance and are fixed for a year, so a client simply pays
a monthly fee.
- Contract milked herds tend to exhibit above average performance
levels, claimed to be due to higher-motivated contract staff with
better herd management skills. Recruitment is undertaken by the
agency, with the expertise in people management required to secure
a high standard of candidate.
However, this option may have several
drawbacks, contract workers tend to be highly-motivated
and may select only the more modern, labour efficient farms. Many
contract herdsmen are paid on a performance-related basis,
requiring them to be given a large degree of autonomy to make day
to day herd management decisions to have most influence on herd
productivity, which may be at odds with a farmer's particular
management style. Compared to employing someone directly, the
service could prove to be significantly more expensive.